NVIDIA Quadro 5000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro 5000 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (152W vs 600W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 120.0GB/s)
16032 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000
0.722 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550
+7161%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
320bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
120.0GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
11
SM Count
-
352
Shading Units
16384
44
TMUs
1024
40
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
640 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.29 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
22.57 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
722.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
361.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
152W
TDP
600W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
100 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
