Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1792GB)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000M
0.518 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M +10%
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
320
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
16.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
518.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GK107
N10E-GLM5-A3
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy