Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
4288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000M
0.518 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +2782%
14.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1230 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

10
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
4608
40
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
155.5 GPixel/s
16.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
466.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.86 TFLOPS
518.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.93 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
466.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
TU102
N10E-GLM5-A3
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
260W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy