Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M and 16GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1597MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
4800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 5000M
0.518 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB +3056%
16.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1245 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1597 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
10
SM Count
80
320
Shading Units
5120
40
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.100 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
204.4 GPixel/s
16.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
511.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.71 TFLOPS
518.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
8.177 TFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GV100
N10E-GLM5-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy