Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M +132%
0.572 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
96
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.560 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
10.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
245.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
20.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.1
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy