Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
88 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 40W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 600 +1071%
0.246 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
May 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
96
Shading Units
8
16
TMUs
4
8
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.560 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
10.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
245.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
20.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
23W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy