Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900 +24826%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
96
96
Shading Units
6144
16
TMUs
384
8
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
96
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.560 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
10.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
245.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
20.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Fermi
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
295W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy