Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
Tesla M2090 +441%
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
96
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.560 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
10.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
245.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
20.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
3 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy