Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

NVIDIA Quadro 600 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 900W)
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050 +317%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

2
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
96
Shading Units
448
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

2.560 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
10.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
245.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
20.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF108
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.585 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
116 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
900W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1300 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy