Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

NVIDIA Quadro 6000 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 204W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 6000
1.028 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +288%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
747 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
96bit
143.4GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
1024
56
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
DG2-128
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

204W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy