NVIDIA Quadro 7000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 7000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro 7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (163.4GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 7000
+22%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2012
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
851 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
163.4GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
18.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
