Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 7000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

NVIDIA Quadro 7000 vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro 7000 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 163.4GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 7000
1.332 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T +937%
13.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2012
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
851 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
163.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
7680
64
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

18.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS

Board Design

204W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
3 billion
Transistors
8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy