Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA L40

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA L40

NVIDIA Quadro CX
VS
NVIDIA L40
NVIDIA Quadro CX
NVIDIA L40
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 48GB VRAM L40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
NVIDIA L40 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2490MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
17984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
L40 +19493%
90.52 TFLOPS
VS
L40

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro CX
Generation
Tesla Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2490 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
142
192
Shading Units
18176
64
TMUs
568
24
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
478.1 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
90.52 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
90.52 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1414 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-895-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
4 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
608 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy