Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20m to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20m 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Tesla K20m +662%
3.524 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro CX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
2496
64
TMUs
208
24
ROPs
40
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy