Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro CX vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800

NVIDIA Quadro CX vs AMD Radeon PRO W7800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX and 32GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2499MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
4288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7800 +9592%
44.78 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro CX
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2499 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
70
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
4480
64
TMUs
280
24
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
70
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
192 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
319.9 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
699.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.56 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.78 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1399 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
260W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy