Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
6112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +13725%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
6144
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
350W
-
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
80 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
8 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy