Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
16 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (32W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro 400 +35%
0.108 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
6
32
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
32W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GT216
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy