NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro GP100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1442MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3552 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro GP100
+12825%
10.34 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1304 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
56
32
Shading Units
3584
16
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.4 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
323.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.67 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.34 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.168 TFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
GP100
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
