Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 +3688%
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1076 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
8
32
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GP106
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy