Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 180W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1733MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro P5000 +10991%
8.873 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1607 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
288.5GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
20
32
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
277.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
138.6 GFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.873 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
277.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
180W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GP104
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
GP104-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy