Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 DGXS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
3552 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Tesla P100 DGXS +13162%
10.61 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1328 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
3584
16
TMUs
224
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
142.1 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
331.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.22 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.61 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
5.304 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GP100
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy