NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+6669%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
42W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
DG2-128
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
