Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 62W)
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D +713%
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
4
32
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
62W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GF106
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.1
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy