Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 51W)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000 +1142%
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK107
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

42W
TDP
51W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy