CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
VS
Intel Arctic Sound M
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
8160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Intel Arctic Sound M
+24900%
14.75 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
VS
Quadro FX 1700
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Sep 2007
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
8192
Shading Units
32
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
115.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
230.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
29.49 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.75 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
3.686 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
500W
TDP
42W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
G84
-
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P400
2
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile
3
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla M4
4
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
5
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
6
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
7
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K200M
8
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
9
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200
10
Intel Arctic Sound M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile
Related News
1
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
2
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
3
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
4
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
5
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
6
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
7
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
8
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
9
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
10
World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy