Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2848 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 +8706%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
797 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
2880
16
TMUs
240
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK110B
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

42W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy