Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1178MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
GRID M60 4A +8077%
4.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GM204
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

42W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy