Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile +11684%
6.953 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
893 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1358 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
20
32
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.18 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.953 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.953 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
108.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
95W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GA106
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
12 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy