Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 8GB VRAM RTX A4000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 115W)
NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
5088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
RTX A4000 Mobile +29052%
17.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1680 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
40
32
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
134.4 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.20 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
268.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
115W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GA104
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
80 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy