Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA L40 CNX

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA L40 CNX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 24GB VRAM L40 CNX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 300W)
NVIDIA L40 CNX 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2475MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
18144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
L40 CNX +152391%
89.97 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1005 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2475 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
142
32
Shading Units
18176
16
TMUs
568
8
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
475.2 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1406 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
89.97 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
89.97 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1406 GFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
AD102
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
AD102-???-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
4 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
608 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy