Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 188W)
NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
208 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Tesla C1060 +954%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
30
32
Shading Units
240
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
188W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GT200B
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy