Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs NVIDIA Quadro K610M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K610M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K610M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 42W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Quadro K610M +537%
0.376 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
32
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.920 GPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.68 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
376.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
15.68 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GK208
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
N15M-Q2-B-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Board Design

42W
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy