Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1747MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Mobile +8935%
8.945 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
20
32
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
GP104
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy