Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
6592 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +12757%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
104
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
6656
32
TMUs
416
12
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
48 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Board Design

59W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
Aldebaran
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy