Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (5GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c +1902%
3.524 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
320bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
64
Shading Units
2496
32
TMUs
208
12
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS

Board Design

59W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
GK110
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy