Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 and 32GB VRAM Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
5056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB +8803%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Mar 2018
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1290 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
876 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
897.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
80
64
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
320
12
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
48 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
17.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
176.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Board Design

59W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G94
GPU Name
GV100
G94 GL-U
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.505 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
240 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy