Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 2800M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 600W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
16288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 2800M
0.288 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550 +18104%
52.43 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
16384
48
TMUs
1024
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
28.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
288.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
600W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N10E-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
100 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy