NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3500M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-III
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1395 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
38.40GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
-
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
9.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
13.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G71
GPU Name
TU117B
-
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Curie
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.278 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
196 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
