Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (68W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200 +799%
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1046 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
64
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GM107
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
68W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy