Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile +2185%
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

8
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
64
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
TU117
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
60W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy