CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M and 16GB VRAM RTX A5000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1575MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
6080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
RTX A5000 Mobile
+11993%
19.35 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
VS
RTX A5000 Mobile
Graphics Card
Feb 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1575 MHz
799 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.14GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
48
-
Compute Units
-
64
Shading Units
6144
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
151.2 GPixel/s
16.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
302.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.35 TFLOPS
160.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
302.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GA104
NB8E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
2
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
3
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
4
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
6
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
7
NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy