NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
+8703%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2007
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
600 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
9.600GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1536
8
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
G86
GPU Name
GK104
NB8M-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
