CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
VS
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370
0.023 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+72900%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370
VS
Data Center GPU Flex 170
Graphics Card
Sep 2007
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
1.440 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
2.880 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
23.04 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
G84
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Board Design
35W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
2
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
3
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
4
NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
5
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
6
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
7
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
8
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M
9
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000
10
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy