NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA A10G
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
9104 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
A10G
+11157%
31.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1320 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
72
112
Shading Units
9216
56
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
78W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
GA102
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
