Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm +1305%
3.935 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2008
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
112
Shading Units
2688
56
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
280.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GK110
G92-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

78W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy