Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
6528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +6328%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
104
128
Shading Units
6656
64
TMUs
416
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
35.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
352.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Aldebaran
NB9E-GLM3
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

75W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy