NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded
+1453%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2022
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
435 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
2048
Shading Units
128
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.800 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.20 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
352.0 GFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
