Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1260MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
7296 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Max Q +5215%
18.71 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
585 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1260 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
58
128
Shading Units
7424
64
TMUs
232
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.0 GPixel/s
35.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
292.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.71 TFLOPS
352.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.71 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
292.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GA103
NB9E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
22 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy