Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M and 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 188W)
NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
Tesla C1060 +76%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
35.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
352.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GT200B
NB9E-GLM3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
188W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy