Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700M and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3700M
0.352 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050 +192%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
35.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
352.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
GF100
NB9E-GLM3
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy